Recovery House VI v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Petitioner Recovery House VI seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Eugene Planning Commission’s approval of a conditional use permit for petitioner’s operation of a drug and alcohol addiction recovery facility in a suburban residential (RA) zone. Petitioner contends that its proposed use of the property is permitted outright in the zone and, therefore, is not subject to the conditions that the city attached to its allowance of the facility as a conditional use. We agree and reverse.
There are a number of residential uses, including single-family attached dwellings,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Lommasson v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- West v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015