Legal Opinion

Grabhorn v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 2016No. 2015018; A161415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Petitioners Howard Grabhorn and Grabhorn, Inc.,1 seek judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that affirmed a Washington County hearings officer’s decision denying petitioners’ application to verify that a composting facility on their property is a lawful nonconforming use. Petitioners contend that “LUBA made a decision unlawful in substance and unsupported by substantial evidence in affirming the Hearings Officer’s decision on the grounds that Petitioner [s’] composting operation had not been lawfully established in 1962 or in 1984,” advancing several arguments in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Aguilar v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Stevens v. City of Island CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Jackson Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Ferguson Creek Investment v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Ferguson Creek Investment v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API