Legal Opinion
Coppola Construction Co. v. Hoffman Enterprises Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 13, 2012No. AC 33102PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff, Coppola Construction Company, Inc., appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court granting the motion for judgment filed by the defendant Jeffrey S. Hoffman 1 and denying the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend its complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred by granting the motion for judgment on count six of the third amended complaint following the court’s granting of Hoffman’s 2 motion to strike that count. We reverse, in part, the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. RellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Gordon v. TobiasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bagley v. Yale UniveristyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- McConologue v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Stuart v. FreibergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Coppola Construction Company, Inc. v. Hoffman Enterprises Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Coppola Construction Co. v. Hoffman Enterprises Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.