Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Tobias
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 25, 2003No. SC 16763PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that a now defunct mortgage loan brokerage corporation, Mutual Mortgage Services, Inc. (Mutual), had acted as an agent for the defendant, Andrew Tobias, for the purpose of *846receiving payments of the balance due on a mortgage held by the defendant on property owned by the plaintiffs, Helene A. Gordon and William J. Gordon.1 The defendant appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court settling title to the property in the plaintiffs. The defendant claims that there was no evidence to support the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Lydall, Inc. v. RuschmeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.