Bagley v. Yale Univeristy
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S OMNIBUS MOTION CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND RELATED ISSUES
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge
Plaintiff has filed an Omnibus Motion [Doc. 172] which requests an order granting seven separate forms of relief, most related to pretrial discovery and related issues. Defendants oppose these requests almost in their entirety. The issues have been thoroughly briefed by counsel. This Ruling resolves them.
The Ruling’s discussion follows the order of the numbered paragraphs in the Omnibus Motion, which arrange and set forth Plaintiffs requests and demands. References to “Yale” refer to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mitchell v. FishbeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- AMERICAN DIAMOND EXCHANGE, INC. v. AlpertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Calco Construction & Development Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In re HaynesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Admiral Insurance Company v. Versailles Medical Spa, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Brooks v. Wheelabrator Bridgeport LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Buck v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Burns v. RovellaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.