Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Van Gilder

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 30, 1993No. 14453; 14454; 14455PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue in these three appeals is whether, under the circumstances of the trial court proceedings, there is a final judgment for purposes of appeal.1 We conclude that there is no final judgment and, accordingly, dismiss the appeals.

Certain facts and the procedural history are undisputed. On December 30,1971, the defendant John C. Van Gilder, a neurosurgeon, performed an operation on the plaintiff, Arthur L. Robbins, at the defendant Yale-New Haven Hospital (hospital), in New Haven. On August 17, 1984, Robbins commenced this action by serving Van Gilder, the hospital, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Greengarden v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Gold v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. ChyungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Bilodeau v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API