Bilodeau v. City of Bristol
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
In this action sounding in nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) directed the jury to return a defendant’s verdict, (2) refused to permit the introduction into evidence of § 16-1 (b) of the code of the city of Bristol and (3) effectively barred the plaintiff from arguing money damages pursuant to General Statutes § 52-216b. We agree that the trial court acted improperly in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Falby v. ZarembskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Rendahl v. PelusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- DiDomizio v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Phinney v. CasaleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Mallinson v. BlackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.