Legal Opinion
Curry v. Burns
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1993No. 14551PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue of this appeal is the continued viability of the application of the general verdict rule to the denial of factually distinct elements of a single cause of action, as previously articulated by this court in Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 202 Conn. 190, 201-204, 520 A.2d 208 (1987). The plaintiff appeals, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court; Curry v. Burns, 27 Conn. App. 439, 606 A.2d 731 (1992); affirming the judgment of the trial court upon the ground that the general verdict rule precluded appellate consideration of her claims…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.