Legal Opinion
Gold v. Newman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 27, 1989No. 13553; 13554PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In this action for breach of contract and other related claims, the court declared a mistrial upon a motion by the defendants because the jury had been *632exposed to evidence not admitted at trial. Some of the jurors, who had commenced deliberations on the case following a trial of eighteen days, declared that they were unable to disregard certain depositions inadvertently given to the jury during their deliberations, despite the court’s instructions to do so. After the mistrial, the defendants moved for judgment in accordance with their previous motions for a directed verdict. The court…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. MenilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- People v. BaxterSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Robbins v. Van GilderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. MorrissetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.