Legal Opinion
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. Brooks Hauser
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1993No. CV 3-92-791PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Murphy Oil USA, Inc.’s (“Murphy Oil”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Murphy Oil alleges breach of the Lease and Franchise Agreement and Sales Agreement with defendant Brooks Hauser (“Brooks”) and seeks a declaratory judgment that Murphy was justified in terminating the franchise under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (“PMPA” or “the Act”) and the terms of the Lease and Franchise Agreement.
Background
On January 25, 1991, Brooks purchased a Lease and Franchise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Francis George Hinkleman v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- F.C. Cycles International, Inc. v. Fila Sport, S.p.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Auto-Chlor System of Minnesota, Inc. v. JohnsonDiverseyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- State Oil Co. v. KhanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.