Legal Opinion
Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. v. Davis
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 21, 1993No. Civ. 93-481-FR, 93-595-FRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, Judge:
The matters before the court are the motions for summary judgment of Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. (Texaco) in its consolidated cases for declaratory judgment against Barry P. Davis (#34 and #74).
UNDISPUTED FACTS
Texaco owns three retail motor fuels stations in the State of Oregon which, until May 23, 1993, had been leased to and operated by Davis. The stations are located in the cities of Salem, Eugene and Clackamas, Oregon.
Texaco sold TEXACO brand motor fuels to Davis pursuant to a separate sales agreement for each retail station. The sales agreements provide Texaco…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- State Oil Co. v. KhanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Interstate Petroleum Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. ZayasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- BP Products North America Inc. v. Grand Petroleum, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.