Legal Opinion

Willis v. Russell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1984No. 833SC239PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Both parties assign error to the trial court ruling on defendants’ motions for directed verdict. The appropriate standard of review is set forth in Koonce v. May, 59 N.C. App. 633, 634, 298 S.E. 2d 69, 71 (1982):

A motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. On such a motion, plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, giving plaintiff the benefit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Harrell v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Executive Leasing Associates, Inc. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Industrial & Textile Piping, Inc. v. Industrial Rigging Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. PEAL BY PEAL v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Brady v. PrinceNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
  4. Peal ex rel. Peal v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Edwards v. Vanguard Fiduciary Tr. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API