Harrell v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
We conclude plaintiff’s action is one in quantum meruit. Plaintiff did not allege an express contract, nor was evidence of an express contract offered. Quantum meruit is an equitable principle that allows recovery for services based upon an implied contract. The law implies a promise to pay for services rendered by one party to another where the recipient knowingly and voluntarily accepts the services and there is no showing that the services were gratuitously given. Johnson v. Sanders, 260 N.C. 291, 132 S.E. 2d 582 (1963).
Defendant contends the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Turner v. Marsh Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Cline v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- F.H. Hood T/A Hood Construction Co. v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. TalfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Paxton v. O.P.F., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.