Executive Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The issue presented upon appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 provides for a summary judgment if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and if any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, and its requirements must be carefully observed in order that no person be deprived of a trial on a genuinely disputed issue. The party moving for a summary judgment has the burden of establishing the lack of a triable issue of material fact by the record properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Durant v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berjian v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Burden Pallet Co. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Cameron & Barkley Co. v. American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Willis v. RussellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Cameron v. CameronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.