Industrial & Textile Piping, Inc. v. Industrial Rigging Services, Inc.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that since the court concluded that the parties had an express subcontract, it erred in not finding that the subcontract incorporated the terms of the general contract between plaintiff and the project owner. The conclusion that the parties made a “verbal contract” was based on findings to the effect that communications and conduct between the parties manifested a mutual assent. The court found, inter alia, that:

The services rendered by the defendant and the material it furnished to the project prior to the date the defendant was forced to leave the job were…