Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1996No. 9505-03475; CA A89594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiff Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. (Schlum-berger), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its claims under ORS 279.067 against defendant Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (Tri-Met). Schlum-berger alleged that Tri-Met improperly awarded a contract for the creation of a fare collection system to intervenor Scheidt & Bachmann, GmbH (S&B). Tri-Met cross-appeals from the trial court’s failure to award it attorney fees under - ORS 279.067(4). We affirm.

As part of the Westside light Rail project in the Portland metropolitan area, Tri-Met issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Rogers v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Hanson v. MosserOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Payne v. American-Strevell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Roberts v. Interstate Distributor Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  5. Parthenon Construction & Design, Inc. v. NeumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API