Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist Examiners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The Board of Psychologist Examiners reprimanded petitioner and fined him $1,000 for treating a minor child without the custodial parent’s consent. The Board concluded that petitioner’s conduct violated the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Ethical Principle 4.Q2.1 On review, petitioner argues that the Board’s notice of proposed disciplinary action failed to comply with ORS 183.415(2)(c) because it did not allege that he had violated Principle 4.02 but instead alleged that he had violated six other ethical principles. Petitioner also argues that the Board’s interpretation of Principle…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Campbell v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- OR-OSHA v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Ceaser v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Pila‘a 400, LLC v. Board of Land and Natural Resources.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- Drayton v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.