Legal Opinion

G. I. Joe's, Inc. v. Nizam

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 2002No. CCV 99-03-185; A112653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff G. I. Joe’s, Inc. brought this judicial appraisal action to determine the fair value of defendant’s stock after defendant exercised his right to dissent from a proposed merger. See ORS 60.551 to ORS 60.594. The central factual dispute at trial was the existence of certain stock options in favor of Norm Daniels, the president of G. I. Joe’s. Plaintiff presented testimony from Daniels and others that, although certain merger documents omitted any reference to the options, that omission was inadvertent and the options did, in fact, exist. Defendant, relying exclusively on those merger…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hayes v. Olmsted & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Jackson v. Nicolai-Neppach Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. K. R. C. v. Three Affiliated TribesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Hill v. GoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API