Forsythe v. City of South St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
In 1919 the defendant city, in grading a street 'known as Camber avenue, adjacent to lots owned by the plaintiff, made a cut in the street, whereby the lateral support of plaintiff’s lots was partly removed. This caused a material part of the surface soil of three of plaintiff’s lots to slide into the street, from which such soil- was removed by defendant. Defendant also entered upon a part of the lots adjoining the street and made a slope back from the street, removing material therefrom for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. McAuleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Morrison v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Beer v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Rutledge v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Schilling v. Carl TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994