Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. City of South St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1929No. 27,392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

In 1919 the defendant city, in grading a street 'known as Camber avenue, adjacent to lots owned by the plaintiff, made a cut in the street, whereby the lateral support of plaintiff’s lots was partly removed. This caused a material part of the surface soil of three of plaintiff’s lots to slide into the street, from which such soil- was removed by defendant. Defendant also entered upon a part of the lots adjoining the street and made a slope back from the street, removing material therefrom for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. McAuleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Morrison v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Beer v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Rutledge v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Schilling v. Carl TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API