Legal Opinion
Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1994No. Civ. 4-94-63PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Hennepin County (“County”), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, owns and operates a mass-burn incinerator which it built as an alternative for disposal of municipal solid waste. The cost of building the incinerator was nearly $129 million. Plaintiffs are Minnesota and Iowa businesses involved in transporting and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Randy's Sanitation, Inc. v. Wright County, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Poor Richard's Inc. v. Ramsey County, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Robinson Rubber Products Co. v. Hennepin County, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996