Legal Opinion

Schilling v. Carl Township

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff brought action, against the township to recover compensation for private property taken and damaged in the laying out of a road. The facts necessary to a proper understanding of the case will be stated later. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $400 and from the judgment entered thereunder the defendant appeals.

There are nineteen specifications of error which, with various subdivisions, present some thirty-two propositions; but, as stated by the appellant himself:

“Appellant’s contentions when boiled down resolve themselves into the following major…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. McClellan v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hager v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API