Morrison v. Mendenhall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner, and being in possession of certain lots in the city of Minneapolis, brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, under section 1, chapter 75, General Statutes, to determine the adverse claim of the defendant.
Read the full summary
The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner, and being in possession of certain lots in the city of Minneapolis, brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, under section 1, chapter 75, General Statutes, to determine the adverse claim of the defendant. The defendant claimed through a deed from Charles Hoag; the plaintiff through a mortgage executed by said Hoag prior to defendant’s deed, to Sidle, Wolford & Co., and by them assigned to one Edward Lewis, wbo foreclosed by advertisement. Plaintiff’s title is derived by deed from the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, through…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
On the 3d day of June, 1857, Jacob K. Sidle, Peter Wolford and James N. Blair, entered into an agreement under seal, containing, among others, the following provisions, viz.: ‘^The said parties have this day agreed to enter into partnership, to engage in the following business, namely, to let or loan moneys, buy and sell real estate, enter and locate lands, &c., and do business under the name and style of Sidle, Wolford & Co. The capital now amounts to six thousand three hundred dollars, and was paid in as follows, viz.: by Sidle $1,100, by Wolford $2,900, and by Blair…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Bank of Genesee v. . the Patchin BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Adams v. CorristonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Gram v. SetonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1828
- Sanborn v. NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Hill v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Pengilly v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Lamm v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.