Conniff v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent Superior Court from enforcing an order made in that court January 30, 1928, in the action entitled Calhoma Oil Corporation et al. v. James E. Conniff et al. The order complained of was an order made after final judgment fixing the amount of stay bond on the appeal from the judgment staying execution of the judgment and restoring the plaintiffs therein to the possession of the real property in suit for the purpose of maintaining the status quo as it existed at the time of the entry of the judgment.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Pierce v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Case-Aimola Properties, Inc. v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Curley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Klement v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Shemanski v. SairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.