Case-Aimola Properties, Inc. v. Thurman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
Upon certiorari having been previously granted to the Court of Appeals, Division 2, appellees landlords present for consideration the question whether sheriffs, when serving writs of execution in forcible entry and detainer actions issued pursuant to 12 O.S.1981 § 1148.10, 1 must remove not only the tenant being evicted from the rental premises, but also all of that tenant’s possessions. We answer in the affirmative. We now reverse and vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellees, owners of residential rental property within…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- In Re the Request of Hamm Production Co. for an Extension of Time in Which to Protest Proposed Gross Production Tax Assessments Issued on July 21, 1981Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Fridena v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Koonce v. Aldo Realty TrustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- World Publishing Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Socia v. Traditions, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.