Shemanski v. Sair
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPatrosso, J.
In this unlawful detainer proceeding plaintiff obtained judgment for restitution of the premises, following which a writ of possession was issued to, and was executed by the marshal. Thereafter plaintiff filed a cost bill after judgment wherein he claimed the sum of $371.37, which included $1.00 for the issuance of the writ and marshal’s fees for executing the same in the sum of $370.37. Included in the latter figure was the amount of $345.67 paid to the marshal for removing and temporarily storing the personal property located in the premises, which latter item was, upon defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Murphy v. F. D. Cornell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Conniff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Commonwealth v. LennonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982