Legal Opinion

Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1889No. 13397PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This was an action to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of San Francisco under the landlord and tenant act, and for the recovery of treble rents for its detention. Trial was had, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and a writ of possession was duly issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff. The writ was partially executed when application was made by the defendant, asking that the judge of the court direct that proceedings be stayed on his filing the necessary undertaking. The order was made and a bond was given, but the sheriff declined to stay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witbeck v. . Van RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  3. Scott v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. McCracken v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API