Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Horowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1999PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Armbruster and his wife filed a negligence suit against Appellee Horowitz and his dental practice in connection with the placement, failure, removal, and replacement of dental implants. After a jury trial, the Honorable James M. Mun-ley presiding, a verdict was returned in favor of Appellee. The jury specifically found that while Appellee was negligent, his negligence was not a substantial factor in bringing about the claimed harm to Appellant. Appellant filed a post-trial motion, claiming that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Mammoccio v. 1818 Market PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API