Armbruster v. Horowitz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant Armbruster and his wife filed a negligence suit against Appellee Horowitz and his dental practice in connection with the placement, failure, removal, and replacement of dental implants. After a jury trial, the Honorable James M. Mun-ley presiding, a verdict was returned in favor of Appellee. The jury specifically found that while Appellee was negligent, his negligence was not a substantial factor in bringing about the claimed harm to Appellant. Appellant filed a post-trial motion, claiming that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Appellee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mammoccio v. 1818 Market PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.