Commonwealth v. Galindes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.
¶ 1 Ethal Galindes (“Galindes”) and Edgar Ortiz (“Ortiz”) appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed following their convictions at a joint bench trial. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court issued two separate opinions aptly summarizing the underlying facts of the case: 1
On October 26, 1999 at approximately 4:30 a.m., Amy Signell was awakened by a knocking at the front door of her boyfriend’s house at 3136 N. Percy Street. The boyfriend, Juan Rodriguez, was not present in the home at the time. Ms Signell heard three knocks but did not answer the door.
Several minutes later she heard her boyfriend’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HunzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. StevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. Thoeun ThaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.