Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Horowitz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2002No. 49 M.D. Appeal Docket 2000PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

The issue in this appeal is whether an appellate court may review a properly preserved weight of the evidence claim *4where the judge who presided over the trial resigned from the bench without ruling on the claim. For the following reasons, we hold that this circumstance is an exception to the general rule that an appellate court may not review a weight of the evidence claim in the first instance, and that the Superior Court properly denied appellants’ weight claim on the merits. Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Court order, which affirmed the judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. VandivnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API