Armbruster v. Horowitz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
The issue in this appeal is whether an appellate court may review a properly preserved weight of the evidence claim *4where the judge who presided over the trial resigned from the bench without ruling on the claim. For the following reasons, we hold that this circumstance is an exception to the general rule that an appellate court may not review a weight of the evidence claim in the first instance, and that the Superior Court properly denied appellants’ weight claim on the merits. Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Court order, which affirmed the judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. VandivnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.