Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Powell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1991PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

In 1987, Donald Powell, appellee, was found guilty of burglary, trespass, simple assault, and related crimes. After the adjudication of appellee’s guilt, the trial court sua sponte granted the appellee’s motion for a new trial, “in the interest of justice.” The Commonwealth appealed and the Superior Court affirmed the action of the trial court, concluding that since the issues raised on appeal were a mixture of law and fact, the Commonwealth lacked jurisdiction to appeal. We granted allocatur to address the following issues: first, whether the granting of a new trial…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API