Commonwealth v. Powell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
In 1987, Donald Powell, appellee, was found guilty of burglary, trespass, simple assault, and related crimes. After the adjudication of appellee’s guilt, the trial court sua sponte granted the appellee’s motion for a new trial, “in the interest of justice.” The Commonwealth appealed and the Superior Court affirmed the action of the trial court, concluding that since the issues raised on appeal were a mixture of law and fact, the Commonwealth lacked jurisdiction to appeal. We granted allocatur to address the following issues: first, whether the granting of a new trial…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.