Commonwealth v. Murray
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PER CURIAM:
The issue in this case is whether we may review the decision of a trial court which has denied a motion for a new trial in a criminal case based on a challenge to the weight of the evidence.1
We have traditionally reviewed the exercise of discretion by a trial court in matters involving challenges to the weight of the evidence. We stated in Commonwealth v. Taylor, 324 Pa.Super. 420, 425, 471 A.2d 1228, 1230 (1984):
Whether a new trial should be granted on grounds that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence is ad*437dressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WhitneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ZapataSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ForbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.