Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1991PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

The issue in this case is whether we may review the decision of a trial court which has denied a motion for a new trial in a criminal case based on a challenge to the weight of the evidence.1

We have traditionally reviewed the exercise of discretion by a trial court in matters involving challenges to the weight of the evidence. We stated in Commonwealth v. Taylor, 324 Pa.Super. 420, 425, 471 A.2d 1228, 1230 (1984):

Whether a new trial should be granted on grounds that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence is ad*437dressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ZapataSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. ForbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API