People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Kawamoto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
In this eminent domain proceeding, judgment on jury verdict was for $140,000. Motion for new trial was denied. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
Defendants’ experts fixed value of the property taken at $145,000 and $142,000, and the owner at $160,000. The state’s experts testified to values of $97,000 and $96,500. The nearness of the jury figure to those of the owners’ witnesses doubtless motivated this appeal, but appellant concedes that the judgment is within the range of the appraisals, and thus supported by evidence. The attack is upon rulings on admissibility of evidence.
Near the close…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Los Angeles City High School District v. KitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- State Roads Commission v. WyvillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- City of Phoenix v. ClaussCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.