County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.
Action to condemn a strip of land and an adjacent easement for drainage. The sole question involved is whether it was error to permit plaintiff’s counsel, in cross-examining an expert who had testified for defendants as to the value of the property to be taken, to bring out the fact that in another ease the expert had expressed a markedly different opinion as to the value of a comparable property. We find no error.
The county sought to condemn a strip of plaintiff’s land, in fee, containing 4,972 square feet, and a drainage easement containing 3,948 square feet, both for road purposes. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Los Angeles City High School District v. KitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Basch v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- People v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- City of Tucson v. LaForgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Langston v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Symms v. Cole Fire Protection DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.