Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Kells

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1971No. 227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Putting aside for the moment the question of whether the third-party complaint itself establishes an affirmative defense, it is to be noted that nowhere in this case is it contended that such third-party complaint fails to state a cause of action. It clearly does.

To constitute a cause of action for negligence there must be: (1) A duty to conform to a certain standard of conduct to protect others against unreasonable risks; (2) a failure to conform to the required standard; (3) a causal connection between the conduct and the injury; and (4) actual loss or damage as a result of the injury. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lemmen v. ServaisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ryan v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API