Ryan v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Much confusion is introduced into the consideration of this case because of the fact that the demurring defendant does not confine itself to the consideration of the allegations contained in each of the pleadings demurred to. No attempt is made to make a statement of the facts set out in the complaint. There is contained in the brief a so-called statement of facts, no reference being- made to where the allegations may be found in the case. Parts of the three pleadings are stated, and then the case is argued as if there was but one pleading in the case. This is a procedure that is not helpful…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Atchison v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Hudson v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Moore v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Shell Oil Co. v. SladeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Thomas v. KellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.