Legal Opinion

Padilla v. Bydalek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1973No. 334PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The following issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Does plaintiff’s complaint allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action in negligence ?

2. Assuming that the complaint states a cause of action in negligence, should the trial court have sustained the defendant’s demurrer on the grounds that, under the facts alleged, as a matter of public policy, the defendant should not be held liable?

Cause of action.

The first four allegations of plaintiff’s complaint are essentially devoted to the relationship between the parties and the events prior to the accident. Plaintiff was an adult employee…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hass v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API