Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Akwa

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1973No. 316PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnoe T. Hansen, J.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether the allegations of plaintiff’s second amended complaint state a cause of action. To state a cause of action it must appear that there is a right in the plaintiff and a violation of this right by the defendant. 4

When challenged by demurrer, pleadings are to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice to the parties and are entitled to all reasonable inferences in favor of the pleadings which can be drawn from the facts pleaded. Padilla v. Bydalek (1973), 56 Wis. 2d 772, 203 N. W. 2d 15; Jennaro v. Jennaro (1971), 52 Wis. 2d 405, 190…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walley v. PatakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Zrimsek v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Crown Life Insurance v. LaBonteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  3. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Epstein Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. ShieldsNevada Supreme Court · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API