Legal Opinion

Jennaro v. Jennaro

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1971No. 212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

It is the position of the appellant that both the original complaint and the third-party complaint fail to state causes of action. Each challenge to each complaint will be considered separately.

Original eom/plaint.

On this appeal it is argued that the demurrer of the third-party defendant challenges the original complaint in the action, as well as the third-party complaint. Respondents defend the sufficiency of the initial complaint without disputing the right of the interpleaded third-party defendant to attack it. The reasoning of an early Wisconsin case would appear to allow a demurrer to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. TichenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Mann v. Erie Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Weiss v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Wolfe v. University National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API