Jennaro v. Jennaro
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
It is the position of the appellant that both the original complaint and the third-party complaint fail to state causes of action. Each challenge to each complaint will be considered separately.
Original eom/plaint.
On this appeal it is argued that the demurrer of the third-party defendant challenges the original complaint in the action, as well as the third-party complaint. Respondents defend the sufficiency of the initial complaint without disputing the right of the interpleaded third-party defendant to attack it. The reasoning of an early Wisconsin case would appear to allow a demurrer to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. TichenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Mann v. Erie Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Weiss v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Wolfe v. University National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.