Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Coleman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1992No. 74-4963; CA A72385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Husband appeals the denial of his motion to set aside an order of default and a default modification order. We reverse and remand.

In August, 1990, wife moved to modify the parties’ dissolution judgment, seeking an increase in child support. Husband was served in October. In November, wife filed a motion and order of default that the court signed on November 30. On May 21,1991, the court entered a modification. On September 16, husband filed a motion captioned “MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF MODIFICATION BY DEFAULT (Evidentiary Hearing and Oral Argument Requested).” The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Page v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Smith v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Sorenson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. Bicar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API