Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Nelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. 15-86-08999; CA A71852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Wife appeals a default judgment that terminated husband’s obligation to pay spousal support. We reverse.

After a 33-year marriage, the parties were divorced in 1987. The judgment ordered husband to pay $820 per month for wife’s “care and support” for five years. After that, husband was to pay $500 per month permanent spousal support. Wife married Noble on March 23, 1991. Three days later, husband moved for an order to show cause why the judgment should not be modified to eliminate his spousal support obligation. He contended that wife’s remarriage constituted a substantial change in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stronach v. EllingsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. In re Marriage of TrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API