Legal Opinion
Sorenson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 22, 2003No. 02CV0022CC; A117976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
The Driver and Motor Vehicle Service Division (DMV) appeals after the trial court vacated the suspension of petitioner’s driving privileges because DMV did not comply with Uniform Trial Court Rule (UTCR) 10.020(1).1 That rule requires DMV to prepare and file a record of the administrative proceeding with the trial court within 30 days of the service of the petition for review of the suspension order. We affirm.
Petitioner was involved in a single-car accident that led to his arrest for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He refused to submit to a Breathalyzer test,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Marriage of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Renfroe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Voth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Wilmoth v. Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Moser v. DKN Ind.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Sorenson v. DRIVER AND MOTOR VEH.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003