Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 2008No. 050606129; A130616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his case against defendant insurer on the ground that “there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause.” ORCP 21 A(3). Plaintiff challenges the dismissal on several grounds, including that defendant failed to comply with the conferral and certification requirements mandated in UTCR 5.010(1) and (3). We agree that defendant’s violation of UTCR 5.010 compelled the denial of its motion to dismiss pursuant to ORCP 21 A(3). Accordingly, we reverse and remand. 1

This case arises from a 1998 automobile accident in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Carlson v. East Salem Assisted Living, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Carlson v. East Salem Assisted Living, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API