Legal Opinion

Page v. Parsons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2012No. 07C17918; A139103PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Plaintiff filed an action against defendants seeking damages for wrongful use of a civil proceeding, abuse of process, and “intentional interference with prospective economic relations.” All of plaintiffs claims against defendants were based on defendants’ opposition to and appeals of state and county waivers issued to plaintiff pursuant to Ballot Measure 37 (2004). In response to plaintiffs complaint, defendants filed a special motion to strike as provided in ORS 31.150 (2007). The trial court granted the motion and entered a general judgment dismissing plaintiffs claims without prejudice,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Rymer v. ZwingliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mullen v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Young v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Neumann v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Yes on 24-367 Committee v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API