Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 9, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner is represented by counsel in this post-conviction matter pending before the Court. She attempted to file a substantive document relating to the case. Since this document was not submitted through counsel, we instructed the Clerk of Court to return the document. Counsel now takes the position that we are required by S. C. Const. Art. I, § 14 1 to accept any document which a litigant wishes to file, regardless whether that document is submitted through counsel. We disagree.

This constitutional provision preserves and guarantees to litigants certain trial rights. It is therefore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StuckeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Dennison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Whelchel v. BazzleDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API