Dennison v. State

*222ORDER

By order dated August 31, 2006, this post-conviction relief (PCR) matter was dismissed due to petitioner’s failure to submit an explanation pursuant to Rule 227(c), SCACR, why the lower court’s finding was improper. Counsel for petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement and a motion to be relieved as counsel and for the appointment of new counsel.

These motions are a result of counsel’s concerns regarding the potential ethical dilemma presented by the requirement for an explanation under Rule 227(c) when a good faith argument or explanation does not exist. We understand *223counsel’…