Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Counsel for petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari from the denial of petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief. Petitioner filed a motion asking the Court to allow him to file a pro se amended petition for a writ of certiorari despite the fact that he is represented by counsel. See Foster v. State, 298 S.C. 306, 379 S.E.2d 907 (1989). However, while the motion was pending, counsel for petitioner submitted the amended petition for a writ of certiorari on petitioner’s behalf along with a letter stating he does not believe any of the issues in the amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Dennison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Whelchel v. BazzleDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. City of Columbia v. Assa'ad-FaltasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. State of Iowa v. Howard J. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API