State v. Stuckey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant submitted a pro se initial brief and designation of matter on appeal and moved this Court to incorporate his initial brief with the initial brief that Robert Dudek of the South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense will file on his behalf. In his motion, appellant states that his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel does not abridge his right as “a pro se litigant to file forth issues on [his] behalf.” In essence, appellant asserts a Sixth Amendment right to hybrid representation or representation which is partially pro se and partially by counsel.
The Sixth…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. GraddickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- State v. Cabrera-PenaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. DevoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.