Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
2Per curiam
This Court has approved the withdrawal of counsel in meritless post-conviction appeals, provided the procedures outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), were followed.
Although the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. Finley,_U. S--, 107 S. Ct. 1990, 95 L. Ed. (2d) 539 (1987), holds that the Anders procedure is not required in such cases, we adhere to our prior procedure.
After review of the entire record in this case and after careful consideration of petitioner’s pro se document, counsel’s…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
4Cited by72 opinions
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Bustos v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.