Woodruff v. Riley
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether the trial court, after finding that the defendant Roberta Smith Riley 1 had received notice via certified mail of the pending action, properly denied her motion to open the default judgment. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts underlying this action reflect an unfortunate situation in which adjoining landowners are not able to relate to one another in a neighborly fashion. As a consequence of the animosity between the parties, the plaintiff, Clifford G. Woodruff, commenced an action against the defendant and her now…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rowe v. GouletConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Rino Gnesi Co. v. SbriglioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Wilson v. TroxlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- City of Bridgeport v. Grace Bldg., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Eremita v. MorelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.