Legal Opinion
Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Cunningham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 26, 2006No. AC 26542PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*642 Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The defendants, William E. Cunningham and Beverly Cunningham, appeal, and the plaintiff, Dur-kin Village Plainville, LLC, cross appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after deciding cross motions for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The court’s judgment resolved a boundary dispute and awarded damages and injunctive relief to the plaintiff for the defendants’ trespass. The defendants claim on appeal that the court (1) improperly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment because the motion and judgment were inconsistent with the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Fattibene v. KealeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Kalama Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Stein v. HortonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Stancuna v. ShermanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Eberhart v. Meadow Haven, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.